SteadyRN

Worked topic practice

NCLEX Pediatric Priorities: 3 Free Practice Questions

Try three pediatric-priority NCLEX-style questions with every option explained in English or Taglish. No account needed; complete worked answers included.

Published · Updated

Try three pediatric-priority questions

Choose an answer, check your reasoning, then compare every option. No account is needed. Your choices last only while this page is open.

Questions and explanations follow your English or Taglish setting. This shared article is in English.

Question 1 of 3

Acting on breathing pauses in an infant

A 7-week-old infant with bronchiolitis is being assessed in a clinic. The caregiver reports several pauses in breathing, and the nurse observes another pause followed by spontaneous breathing. The infant is now breathing but has marked chest retractions. Which action takes priority?

Choose one answer before checking.

Read all worked answers (also works without JavaScript)

Open this version to read the complete questions, options and explanations at your own pace.

1. Acting on breathing pauses in an infant

A 7-week-old infant with bronchiolitis is being assessed in a clinic. The caregiver reports several pauses in breathing, and the nurse observes another pause followed by spontaneous breathing. The infant is now breathing but has marked chest retractions. Which action takes priority?

Best answer: B

  • A. Offer a full bottle before deciding whether a referral is needed. Feeding does not address the reported and observed breathing pauses. Marked breathing effort also makes a feeding trial an unsafe reason to delay escalation.
  • B. Activate emergency help and arrange immediate hospital transfer while supporting and monitoring airway and breathing under protocol. Breathing pauses with marked respiratory effort require emergency assessment. Continue airway and breathing support while the emergency team and transfer are arranged; do not wait for another pause.
  • C. Wait for the oxygen saturation to fall before escalating care. The observed pauses and marked retractions already justify emergency escalation. An oxygen reading is part of assessment, not a reason to wait for further deterioration.
  • D. Schedule a routine follow-up because breathing restarted without stimulation. Spontaneous recovery from one pause does not make repeated pauses safe. Routine follow-up leaves a potentially unstable infant without urgent assessment.

Decisive cue: Repeated breathing pauses, including one observed by the nurse, with marked chest retractions.

Escalate breathing pauses promptly. If breathing becomes absent or inadequate, provide emergency breathing support under the pediatric resuscitation protocol.

NICE NG9: bronchiolitis emergency referral · 2026-10-08

2. Using age when assessing a fever

During telephone triage, a caregiver reports that a 6-week-old infant has an axillary temperature of 38.2°C measured with an electronic thermometer. The infant is awake, feeding as usual and has had no recent vaccination. No breathing difficulty is reported. Which advice is most appropriate?

Best answer: A

  • A. Arrange urgent face-to-face assessment through the young-infant fever pathway now, even though feeding and appearance seem reassuring. Fever at this age needs prompt clinical assessment. Reassuring feeding does not cancel the age-related risk; arrange assessment rather than waiting for additional symptoms.
  • B. Give an antipyretic and seek assessment only if the temperature stays high. A lower temperature after medicine does not establish that the illness is minor. Waiting for the response would delay assessment of a young infant with fever.
  • C. Reassure the caregiver that normal feeding rules out a serious infection. Normal feeding alone cannot rule out serious illness in a young infant. The reported fever and age still need assessment.
  • D. Book a routine appointment in two days if no new symptoms appear. A routine delay is inappropriate for fever in this young infant. The absence of additional reported symptoms does not remove the need for urgent assessment.

Decisive cue: The infant is only 6 weeks old and has a measured temperature of 38.2°C.

Interpret fever together with age. A young infant can need urgent assessment even when the caregiver describes normal feeding and alertness.

NICE NG143: fever in young infants · 2026-10-08

3. Recognizing shock after fluid losses

A 3-year-old with repeated vomiting and watery diarrhea is assessed in an urgent-care clinic. The child is increasingly drowsy, has mottled skin and cold hands, and has a rapid heart rate with weak peripheral pulses. Which response is the priority?

Best answer: D

  • A. Continue an oral rehydration trial and reassess after one hour. Oral rehydration is useful in appropriate dehydration cases, but these signs suggest shock. Drowsiness and poor circulation call for emergency care, not a delayed oral-fluid trial.
  • B. Wait for a stool test to identify the organism before escalating. Identifying an organism does not take priority over the child’s circulation and responsiveness. Waiting leaves the immediate threat untreated.
  • C. Allow the child to sleep and repeat the assessment when the child wakes. Increasing drowsiness alongside poor circulation is a warning sign, not reassurance. Delaying assessment risks further deterioration.
  • D. Activate emergency help, support airway, breathing and circulation, and arrange immediate hospital transfer with protocol-directed IV resuscitation. The combined changes in consciousness, skin, extremities and pulses suggest shock. Activate emergency care and support the child while transfer and IV resuscitation are coordinated under the clinical protocol.

Decisive cue: Increasing drowsiness plus mottled skin, cold extremities and weak pulses after vomiting and diarrhea.

Distinguish dehydration from suspected shock using the whole assessment. Shock signs require emergency escalation and resuscitation; do not delay for oral fluids or test results.

NICE CG84: dehydration and shock · 2026-10-08

Original educational examples, not official NCLEX items or clinical care protocols. Sources were checked with automated review; credentialed clinician sign-off is not claimed.

This shared guide is in English. The practice questions and explanations above follow your selected language.

A single reassuring detail can distract from a child's urgent assessment cue. Try the three questions above, then compare what each option addresses and what it delays. No account is required. Your choices stay on this page and reset on refresh.

Questions and explanations follow your English or Taglish setting. This shared article is in English. Open Read all worked answers for the complete set, including without JavaScript.

By SteadyRN. These are original educational examples, not official NCLEX items or clinical care protocols. Sources were checked through automated review; credentialed clinician sign-off is not claimed. See our editorial methodology.

What changes the priority?

Breathing pauses need an emergency response

The infant in the first example resumes breathing, but repeated pauses and marked chest retractions remain concerning. The NICE bronchiolitis guideline, recommendation 1.2.1 identifies observed or reported apnea as a reason for immediate emergency referral. The response combines escalation with continuing airway and breathing support. It does not wait for a lower oxygen reading or another episode.

Age changes how fever is assessed

The second example describes a 6-week-old with a measured fever who is still feeding normally. The NICE fever guideline, recommendations 1.2.12 and 1.3.3 supports urgent face-to-face assessment for this age-related high-risk feature. Normal feeding and a response to fever medicine do not replace assessment. The question asks for the next triage action, not a diagnosis or an automatic treatment order.

Poor circulation changes the fluid-loss plan

In the third example, drowsiness, mottled skin, cold extremities and weak pulses occur together after vomiting and diarrhea. The NICE gastroenteritis guideline, table 1 and section 1.7 distinguishes shock signs from less severe dehydration and supports emergency escalation. The example focuses on recognizing the urgent pattern and coordinating resuscitation under protocol, without teaching a fluid dose or assuming that dehydration is the only possible cause.

Make a short reasoning note

After each question, name:

  • The cue: what made the infant or child need prompt help?
  • The tempting reassurance: breathing restarted, feeding seemed normal, or vomiting sounded like a routine illness.
  • The delay avoided: a feeding trial, waiting for another symptom, or postponing care for a test result.

These three examples do not cover every pediatric emergency or estimate exam readiness. Use current local pediatric protocols and qualified supervision in patient care.

Keep practicing

Use the topic links below for more no-account examples. The separate account bank offers 30 free questions in English and Taglish and requires a free account. The readiness check is a broader study-planning tool, not a pass guarantee.

Sources checked 8 October 2026: NICE NG9 bronchiolitis recommendations, NG143 fever recommendations, and CG84 gastroenteritis recommendations linked above. Guidance was accessed as published on that date; automated review is not clinical or native-language human certification. Report a correction.